Section 2 Regulated Persons and Their Activities

Investment adviser definition and exclusions

15 min read · Lesson 9 of 16

About This Lesson

Track three: the advisers. Where broker-dealers sell securities, investment advisers advise on them — and the whole definition compresses into three letters the Series 63 will test you on repeatedly: the ABC test. Advice about securities, in the Business of giving it, for Compensation. All three or nothing. The rest of the chapter is about who escapes the definition — and the two-word phrases ("solely incidental," "special compensation") that decide whether an escape hatch holds.

What you'll cover

  • the statutory definition under Advisers Act §202(a)(11) and USA §401(f), and how it collapses into the ABC test
  • the exclusions: banks, the LATE professionals (Lawyer, Accountant, Teacher, Engineer), broker-dealers, publishers, and federal covered advisers
  • the two traps that police every exclusion: "solely incidental" and "no special compensation" — and the tests for each
  • the three-filter framework, including the Exempt Reporting Adviser category

The ABC test is one of the highest-frequency concepts on the Series 63 — when in doubt on any adviser question, start by running the three prongs.

The statutory definition — Advisers Act §202(a)(11) and USA §401(f)

Both the federal Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the model Uniform Securities Act define "investment adviser" using the same core elements — and the statutory language is worth reading once in full, because the ABC test is hiding inside it:

For compensation, engages in the business of advising others, either directly or through publications or writings, as to the value of securities or as to the advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities, or who, for compensation and as part of a regular business, issues or promulgates analyses or reports concerning securities.

This definition collapses into the ABC test:

  • A — Advice about securities. The advice must be specifically about securities — not generic financial wellness, not insurance, not commodities, not real estate. The advice can be specific recommendations or general analysis, written or oral.
  • B — In the business. The person must hold themselves out as in the business of giving such advice, OR provide such advice on a regular basis. Occasional or incidental advice does not satisfy this prong.
  • C — For compensation. The person receives some form of compensation for the advice — cash fees, asset-based fees, commissions, hourly billing, or any other economic benefit. The compensation need not be direct or labeled as advisory fee.

All three prongs must be satisfied. If any one prong fails, the person is not an investment adviser under the statutory definition — and that "any one" is where the Series 63 hides its answers. This is the most heavily tested concept in this chapter; run A, then B, then C, every time.

All three prongs must be satisfied for a person to be an investment adviser. Miss any one and the person is not an IA.

A

Advice

About securities

Provides advice or analysis about securities — specific recommendations or general analyses.

Counts

  • Stock picks
  • Portfolio allocation
  • Securities-specific newsletter
B

Business

In the business

Holds out as in the business OR provides advice regularly. Not occasional or incidental.

Counts

  • Marketing oneself as adviser
  • Routine advisory engagement
  • Public profile / website
C

Compensation

Any economic benefit

Receives some form of compensation — direct or indirect, fee or commission, hourly or asset-based.

Counts

  • Asset-based fees
  • Hourly rates
  • Performance fees (when allowed)

Exclusions from the IA definition

Passing the ABC test isn't the end of the analysis. USA §401(f) and Advisers Act §202(a)(11) enumerate categories of persons who are excluded from the IA definition even though their work involves some securities-related advice — the judgment being that these professionals are sufficiently regulated under other regimes that adding IA registration would be redundant.

Banks and bank holding companies. Banks are excluded from the federal IA definition under Advisers Act §202(a)(11)(A); state law parallels this. The exclusion covers the bank itself, not subsidiaries or affiliates that operate as separate advisory entities. A bank's trust department giving advice is generally excluded; a bank-affiliated registered investment adviser is not.

Lawyers, accountants, engineers, and teachers (the "LATE" exclusion). Members of these four professions are excluded if their advice is solely incidental to their profession AND they receive no special compensation for the advice. Both conditions must hold. A lawyer who casually advises an estate client about diversification is excluded. A lawyer who charges a separate hourly fee for portfolio review is NOT excluded.

Broker-dealers and their agents. BDs and agents are excluded from the IA definition if their advice is solely incidental to their brokerage business AND they receive no special compensation for the advice. The 2019 SEC Regulation Best Interest does not change this exclusion — commissions paid on securities transactions are not "special compensation" for advice. Separate advisory fees charged for advice ARE special compensation and defeat the exclusion.

Publishers of bona fide newspapers, news magazines, and business or financial publications of general and regular circulation. The publication must be of general circulation, not tailored to specific subscribers' circumstances, and the publisher must not provide individualized advice. A newsletter that offers individualized portfolio recommendations to subscribers is NOT excluded.

Federal covered advisers (excluded from state registration). Advisers registered with the SEC are excluded from state registration in any state where they have a place of business, but they may be required to notice-file. This is the federal-state allocation mechanism, covered in detail in Section 2.

Other narrower exclusions: family offices serving only family clients, advisers whose only clients are insurance companies, certain advisers to small business investment companies, and certain church plan advisers, among others.

The solely-incidental and special-compensation traps

Two phrases govern the LATE and BD exclusions, and the exam tests them relentlessly — because each one has a precise meaning that fact patterns are built to blur. Get these two definitions exactly right and this chapter's hardest questions become routine.

"Solely incidental" means the advice arises only in the course of, and is reasonably related to, the primary professional activity. The advice is a byproduct of the primary work, not a separately-marketed service. Tests for this prong:

  • Is the advice part of the natural flow of the professional engagement?
  • Does the professional hold themselves out as an investment adviser in marketing materials, bios, or business cards?
  • Does the professional maintain a separate advisory practice or department?
  • Is the advice required to fulfill the underlying professional duty, or could the duty be discharged without the advice?

"No special compensation" means no separate fee or other economic benefit for the advice itself. The professional may receive compensation for the underlying primary service (legal fees, accounting fees, brokerage commissions), but not an additional, separately-identifiable fee for the advisory component. Tests:

  • Is there an itemized advisory fee, hourly rate for advisory work, or asset-based fee?
  • Does the bill list "investment advice" as a separate line item?
  • Is the total fee higher because of the advisory component?
  • Are there performance bonuses, success fees, or referral payments tied to investment outcomes?

If either test fails, the exclusion fails. A CPA who occasionally suggests asset allocation as part of tax planning, with no separate fee, is excluded. The moment that CPA starts a weekly investment newsletter for subscribers, opens a fee-based advisory practice, or charges separately for portfolio review, the exclusion collapses and IA registration is required. The exclusion protects the byproduct, never the business line.

"Is this person an IA?" — the answer framework

When the Series 63 describes someone giving securities-related advice, run three filters:

  • ABC test: Advice about securities + In the business + Compensation. All three must be present. If any one is missing, they are not an IA.
  • Categorical exclusion: Bank, LATE professional (Lawyer, Accountant, Engineer, Teacher) with solely-incidental advice and no special compensation, BD or agent (same conditions), publisher of general-circulation periodical, federal covered adviser excluded from state registration.
  • Exempt Reporting Adviser: Solely private-fund adviser with under $150M U.S. AUM, OR adviser solely to qualifying venture capital funds. Reduced filing burden under Form ADV Part 1A only.

The heaviest trap on the whole track: solely-incidental + no special compensation. The professional must satisfy BOTH conditions — any separate fee, or any holding-out-as-adviser, defeats the exclusion. When a fact pattern mentions a "small additional fee," the exclusion just died.

Concept Check

Under the ABC test, a person is an investment adviser if they provide advice about securities:

Under the Uniform Securities Act, an investment adviser is any person who (A) provides advice or issues reports concerning securities, (B) is in the business of providing such advice (regularity, holding out as an adviser, or primary source of livelihood), and (C) receives compensation — direct or indirect, monetary or in-kind. All three prongs must be met. The 'business' element distinguishes occasional friendly advice from professional advisory activity; the 'compensation' element captures any form of consideration, including soft dollars or implied fees built into other transactions. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-abc-test -->
Concept Check

A lawyer provides investment advice to clients as part of a comprehensive estate plan. The lawyer charges a standard hourly rate that does not change based on the investment advice component. The lawyer:

The lawyer/accountant/engineer/teacher (LATE) exclusion under USA §201(b) applies only when the investment advice is SOLELY INCIDENTAL to the professional's primary practice AND no separate compensation is charged for the advice. A lawyer who provides investment recommendations as part of a comprehensive estate plan, without a separate charge for the investment advice itself, fits squarely within the exclusion. The moment the lawyer charges a separate advisory fee, holds out as an investment adviser, or makes investment advice a regular part of practice rather than incidental to legal work, the exclusion is lost. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-lawyer-estate-incidental -->
Concept Check

A registered broker-dealer's agent recommends specific stock purchases to a customer in the ordinary course of soliciting brokerage transactions. The customer pays standard commissions on the trades. Under USA Section 401(f), this agent:

The BD/agent exclusion under USA Section 401(f) and Advisers Act Section 202(a)(11)(C) applies when (1) the advice is solely incidental to the brokerage business and (2) the BD/agent receives no special compensation for the advice. Commissions paid on securities transactions are NOT special compensation for advice &mdash; they are compensation for the brokerage transaction. The agent giving routine securities recommendations as part of soliciting trades fits squarely within the exclusion. The exclusion is lost only when the BD/agent charges a separate advisory fee or holds out as offering advisory services. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-bd-exclusion-incidental -->
Concept Check

A financial newsletter publisher offers individualized portfolio recommendations to subscribers based on each subscriber's questionnaire responses. The newsletter charges an annual subscription fee. Under USA Section 401(f), the publisher:

The publisher exclusion requires that the publication be of <em>general and regular circulation</em> and not tailored to individual subscribers' circumstances. Once the publisher provides individualized advice &mdash; here, recommendations based on subscriber questionnaires &mdash; the exclusion is defeated and the publisher meets the IA definition. The publisher receives compensation (subscription fees), is in the business (regularly publishes), and provides advice about securities. All three ABC prongs are satisfied, and no exclusion applies. The subscription fee amount and subscriber count are irrelevant to the analysis. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-publisher-tailored-loses-exclusion -->
Concept Check

A certified public accountant provides comprehensive tax preparation services to high-net-worth clients. As part of the tax engagement, she advises clients on year-end tax-loss harvesting strategies, including specific recommendations about which positions to sell. She bills clients a flat tax-preparation fee with no separate charge for investment advice. Under USA Section 401(g), this accountant is:

Under USA Section 401(g)(2)(B), an accountant whose investment advice is solely incidental to her accounting practice is excluded from the IA definition. The three-prong LATE test ("Lawyer, Accountant, Teacher, Engineer") requires: (1) qualified professional status, (2) advice solely incidental to the primary profession, and (3) no special compensation for the advice. The CPA here meets all three: CPA-qualified, tax-loss advice incidental to tax preparation, no separate fee. If she charged a separate fee for the investment advice, the third prong would fail and she would need to register as an IA. The exclusion is fact-specific to each engagement. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-late-accountant-exclusion -->
Concept Check

A registered broker-dealer offers a fee-based wrap account program in which clients pay an annual asset-based fee covering both execution and advice. With respect to advisory activity in those wrap accounts, the broker-dealer is:

Under USA Section 401(g)(2)(C) and Investment Advisers Act Section 202(a)(11)(C), a broker-dealer is excluded from the IA definition only when advisory activity is solely incidental AND no special compensation is received for the advice. A wrap fee (asset-based, not transaction-based) is special compensation for advice, defeating the exclusion. The BD becomes an investment adviser for the wrap-fee activity and must register (federally if AUM exceeds $110 million, state if below). Traditional commission-based brokerage with incidental recommendations remains outside the IA definition; the wrap fee is the trigger. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-bd-wrap-fee-special-comp -->
Concept Check

A group of friends forms an investment club to pool $200,000 and collectively decide which stocks to purchase. Each member contributes time researching investment ideas, but no member receives compensation for these efforts. Under USA Section 401(g), the club members are:

Under USA Section 401(g)(1), an investment adviser is a person who (A) provides advice about securities, (B) is in the business of providing advice, and (C) receives COMPENSATION for the advice. All three prongs must be met. Investment club members who pool money to invest and informally research ideas fail the compensation prong (and likely the "in the business" prong as well). They are not investment advisers under the USA. The result would change if one member were paid for research, or if the club marketed advice services to non-members. Casual member-to-member recommendations within a personal investment club fall outside the regulatory framework. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-investment-club-no-comp -->
Concept Check

A state-chartered commercial bank establishes a trust department that manages discretionary investment accounts for high-net-worth clients. The bank charges trust administration fees that include investment management. Under USA Section 401(g), the bank is:

Under USA Section 401(g)(2)(A) and Investment Advisers Act Section 202(a)(11)(A), banks and bank holding companies are excluded from the investment adviser definition. The exclusion applies to all bank activities, including trust department services with discretionary investment management. Banks are already comprehensively regulated by federal and state banking authorities. The exclusion is intrinsic to bank status, not dependent on AUM, client mix, or jurisdiction. A separately-identifiable bank department or subsidiary that holds itself out as investment adviser may lose the exclusion under specific Dodd-Frank carve-outs, but ordinary trust department activity remains protected. <!-- CC:s63-investment-advisers-bank-exclusion -->