Section 1Economic Factors and Business Information
Financial Ratios
42 min read
· Lesson 3 of 4
Financial Ratios
Financial ratios let an adviser size up a company quickly — its ability to pay short-term debts, how aggressively it uses leverage, how efficiently it turns sales into profit, and how the market values its earnings. The Series 66 doesn't ask you to memorize every formula or crank through long calculations. It asks you to interpret ratios in context — against a company's own history, against peers in the same industry, and in combination with other ratios that tell you whether the headline number is real or an artifact of leverage.
Financial ratios are the adviser's shorthand for a company's financial health. They reduce a balance sheet and income statement to a handful of numbers that can be compared — across time, across companies, across industries. The Series 66 doesn't reward students who can compute every ratio fastest; it rewards students who know which ratio answers a particular question and what its limits are.
Two themes run through this chapter. First, no single ratio tells the whole story — a strong current ratio can mask inefficient cash management; a high ROE can be the product of dangerous leverage. Second, ratios only acquire meaning in context — against the company's own history (trend analysis), against direct competitors (peer comparison), or against industry norms (sector benchmarks). A ratio in isolation is just a number.
The five categories of financial ratios
Financial ratios cluster into five families. Each answers a different question about the company.
Liquidity
Can the company pay short-term bills as they come due?
Current, Quick, Working capital
Leverage
How much debt is financing the company?
Debt-to-Equity, Debt-to-Total-Capital
Coverage
Can the company pay the interest on its debts?
Times-Interest-Earned (TIE)
Profitability
How efficiently does the company turn inputs into profit?
Net margin, ROA, ROE, EPS
Valuation
How does the market price the company relative to fundamentals?
P/E, P/B, dividend yield
Valuation ratios get full treatment in the next chapter (Valuation Factors); this chapter focuses on the first four families, with a brief preview of valuation at the end.
Ratios only mean something in context
A single ratio in isolation tells you almost nothing. Ratios become useful when compared to (1) the same company's historical ratios (trend analysis), (2) industry averages, or (3) direct competitors (peer comparison). A debt-to-equity of 3.0 might be perfectly normal for a utility company but alarming for a software firm. A current ratio of 1.5 might be improving for a company that was at 0.9 last year, or deteriorating for one that was at 2.5.
Concept Check
A regulated utility company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.8. A software firm in the same year reports a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.6. Which statement most accurately reflects how an adviser should interpret these numbers?
Industry context is everything for leverage ratios. Capital-intensive, asset-heavy businesses with predictable cash flows — utilities, telecoms, REITs, banks — routinely operate with D/E ratios of 2.0 to 5.0 and remain financially sound. Asset-light, intangible-heavy businesses like software typically operate at D/E below 1.0 because they have fewer hard assets to borrow against and more volatile cash flows. The same numerical ratio leads to opposite conclusions in different sectors, which is one of the most-tested traps on the Series 66.
Concept Check
Which statement best describes how the Series 66 expects an adviser to use financial ratios when evaluating a company?
The Series 66 emphasizes interpretation over calculation. A ratio in isolation is just a number; it acquires meaning only when compared to something — the company's own trend over time, direct peer competitors, or industry benchmarks. The exam frequently presents a ratio and asks what the adviser should do next; the right answer is almost always 'investigate further' or 'compare to context,' never 'recommend buy or sell based on the single data point alone.' This contextual mindset distinguishes professional analysis from mechanical computation.
Section 2 of 5~7 min · 3 concept checks
Liquidity ratios
Current and quick ratios
Liquidity ratios measure a company's ability to meet obligations due within the next year. The two most-tested are the current ratio and the quick ratio.
Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
Above 1.0 means the company has more short-term assets than short-term obligations.
Higher is generally better, but extremely high ratios may indicate inefficient use of cash and inventory (idle assets that could be deployed productively).
A useful rule of thumb: between 1.5 and 3.0 is typically healthy for most industries.
Quick ratio = (Current assets − Inventory) ÷ Current liabilities
The quick ratio (also called the acid-test ratio) is the stricter version. It excludes inventory because inventory may not convert quickly to cash, or may need to be sold at a discount in a pinch. The quick ratio tests whether the company can pay short-term debts without relying on selling inventory.
Working capital — the dollar version
Working capital is the absolute-dollar cousin of the current ratio. Instead of expressing the relationship as a ratio, it expresses the difference directly:
Working capital = Current assets − Current liabilities
A company with $800K in current assets and $400K in current liabilities has $400K of working capital — the cushion available to fund day-to-day operations after paying the next year's bills. Positive working capital is the usual healthy state; negative working capital means short-term liabilities exceed short-term assets, which can be a yellow flag for liquidity stress.
Negative working capital isn't automatically fatal — some businesses (notably retailers like Walmart, who collect from customers fast and pay suppliers slowly) operate intentionally with negative working capital. But for most companies it warrants further investigation.
Current vs. quick ratio — side by side
Current ratio
CA ÷ CL
Includes inventory?
Yes
What it tests
Total short-term debt-paying ability — all current assets count
Healthy range
Generally 1.5 to 3.0 (varies by industry)
Quick ratio
Stricter
(CA − Inv) ÷ CL
Includes inventory?
No — inventory may be slow to convert to cash
What it tests
Debt-paying ability without needing to sell inventory
Healthy range
At or above 1.0 is typically the floor
Concept Check
A company has current assets of $500,000, inventory of $200,000, and current liabilities of $250,000. Its quick ratio is closest to:
Quick ratio = (Current assets − Inventory) ÷ Current liabilities = ($500,000 − $200,000) ÷ $250,000 = $300,000 ÷ $250,000 = 1.2. The quick ratio strips out inventory because inventory may not convert to cash quickly or may need to be sold at a discount in a pinch. By contrast, the current ratio (which includes inventory) would be $500,000 ÷ $250,000 = 2.0 — the trap distractor. The quick ratio is the stricter test of immediate liquidity, and the Series 66 expects you to recognize the formula on sight.
Concept Check
Why is the quick ratio considered a more conservative measure of short-term liquidity than the current ratio?
The quick ratio (acid-test) removes inventory from current assets because inventory may take time to sell, may need to be sold at a discount in a forced sale, or may be obsolete. This makes it a stricter test of a company's ability to meet its immediate obligations using assets that are already cash or near-cash (cash itself, marketable securities, and receivables). A company with a healthy current ratio but a weak quick ratio is heavily dependent on inventory — a potential warning sign if the inventory is slow-moving or seasonal.
Concept Check
ABC Co. reports current assets of $400,000 and current liabilities of $450,000. Its working capital is:
Working capital = Current assets − Current liabilities = $400,000 − $450,000 = −$50,000. Negative working capital means short-term obligations exceed short-term assets, which is generally a yellow flag for liquidity. The current ratio here is 0.89 (below 1.0), confirming the strain. Negative working capital isn't automatically fatal — some businesses like retailers operate intentionally with negative working capital by collecting customer payments fast and paying suppliers slowly — but in most contexts it warrants further investigation.
Section 3 of 5~7 min · 2 concept checks
Leverage & coverage
Debt-to-equity ratio
Debt-to-equity is the most-tested leverage ratio on the Series 66. It measures how much of a company's financing comes from debt vs. owners' equity.
Debt-to-Equity = Total liabilities ÷ Shareholders' equity
D/E = 1.0 — equal amounts of debt and equity financing.
D/E = 2.0 — $2 of debt for every $1 of equity (highly leveraged in most industries).
D/E < 1.0 — the company is more equity-financed than debt-financed.
Higher leverage means greater financial risk — fixed interest payments must be made regardless of how earnings perform, so highly levered companies are more vulnerable to downturns. Higher leverage also magnifies returns to equity when things go well, which is why management teams often prefer some debt in the capital structure. The challenge is knowing what level of leverage is appropriate, which depends entirely on the industry.
Times-interest-earned (TIE) — coverage
Debt-to-equity tells you how much debt the company has. Times-interest-earned tells you whether the company can comfortably service that debt:
TIE = EBIT ÷ Interest expense
Where EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, also called operating income) represents the company's earnings available to pay interest. The ratio expresses how many times over the company's operating earnings could cover its annual interest bill.
TIE > 4.0 — comfortable coverage; minimal default risk from interest payments.
TIE between 1.5 and 3.0 — adequate but watch closely; a downturn could squeeze coverage.
TIE < 1.0 — operating earnings aren't even covering interest. The company is paying its lenders out of cash reserves or new borrowing, which isn't sustainable.
TIE is the single most important ratio for assessing whether a company's bonds are likely to default. It comes back in Module 2's fixed-income chapters as the primary credit-quality screen.
Leverage in context — industry norms vary widely
A debt-to-equity ratio of 2.0 means very different things depending on what business you're in:
Low-leverage industries
Software, biotech, professional services — typical D/E often below 0.5
Few hard assets to borrow against; cash flows can be volatile
Medium-leverage industries
Manufacturing, retail, consumer goods — D/E often 0.5 to 1.5
Balanced asset bases and earnings stability
High-leverage industries
Utilities, telecom, REITs, banks — D/E often 2.0 to 5.0+
Hard assets, predictable cash flows, regulated returns
Exam takeaway: when a Series 66 question describes a company's leverage, look for industry cues. A utility with D/E of 2.5 is unremarkable. A tech firm with D/E of 2.5 is a red flag. Same number, opposite reading.
Concept Check
A company's debt-to-equity ratio increases from 1.5 to 3.0 over two years. This MOST likely indicates:
A rising debt-to-equity ratio indicates the company is financing a larger proportion of its operations with debt relative to equity. The shift can happen through borrowing more, repurchasing shares (which reduces equity), or both. Either way, financial risk rises: more debt means more fixed interest payments and larger principal obligations that must be paid regardless of how earnings perform. The company becomes more vulnerable to downturns. None of the distractor choices follow logically from the D/E movement alone — profitability, liquidity, and share splits are unrelated.
Concept Check
A company's EBIT (operating income) is $4 million and its annual interest expense is $1 million. Which statement most accurately characterizes the company's interest coverage?
Times-interest-earned = EBIT ÷ Interest expense = $4M ÷ $1M = 4.0. A TIE of 4.0 means the company's operating earnings could cover its interest obligation four times over, which is generally considered comfortable coverage. Below 1.0 means operating earnings aren't even covering interest (the company is paying lenders from cash reserves or new borrowing); between 1.5 and 3.0 is adequate but watch closely; above 4.0 is typically safe. TIE is the single most-used credit-quality screen for assessing bond default risk.
Section 4 of 5~8 min · 4 concept checks
Profitability ratios
Net margin, ROA, and ROE
Profitability ratios measure how effectively a company converts its inputs — sales, assets, equity — into bottom-line profit. The three most-tested are net profit margin, return on assets, and return on equity.
Net profit margin = Net income ÷ Revenue. What percentage of every sales dollar ends up as profit. A 5% margin means 5 cents of profit per dollar of revenue. Margins vary enormously by industry — grocers operate on 1-3% margins; software companies often 20%+.
Return on Assets (ROA) = Net income ÷ Total assets. How much profit the company generates per dollar of assets deployed. Measures pure operating efficiency, independent of how the assets are financed.
Return on Equity (ROE) = Net income ÷ Shareholders' equity. How much profit the company generates per dollar of equity capital. ROE is what shareholders ultimately care about, but it's distorted by leverage — heavy borrowing mechanically inflates ROE without improving operating efficiency.
The relationship to lock in: ROE = ROA × (Total assets ÷ Equity). The right-hand term is the equity multiplier (a function of leverage). Two companies with identical ROA will report very different ROEs if one is far more leveraged. That's why the next block's leverage trap exists.
Earnings per share (EPS)
EPS is profitability expressed on a per-share basis — the headline number that drives equity valuation:
Basic EPS = Net income ÷ Weighted-average shares outstanding
Diluted EPS uses a larger denominator that includes shares that could be issued if outstanding stock options, warrants, or convertible securities were exercised. Diluted EPS is always less than or equal to basic EPS — never higher. Most analysis uses diluted EPS as the more conservative number.
EPS is the building block of the price-to-earnings ratio in Section 5. A company can grow EPS in three ways: by growing net income, by reducing share count through buybacks, or both. Buyback-driven EPS growth without underlying income growth is a Series 66 trap — the per-share number rises while the business itself isn't more profitable.
Profitability ratios — side by side
Net profit margin
Net income ÷ Revenue
Measures
Profit per sales dollar
Best for
Comparing pricing power and cost discipline across firms
Return on assets (ROA)
Net income ÷ Total assets
Measures
Operating efficiency, independent of financing
Best for
Comparing companies with different leverage
Return on equity (ROE)
Net income ÷ Equity
Measures
Return on shareholder capital, amplified by leverage
Best for
Shareholders' bottom-line return — pair with D/E
Financial ratios calculator
Drop in any company's balance-sheet and income-statement figures to see all six ratios light up. The defaults are loaded with ABC Corp from the worked example below.
Current ratio
2.00
Quick ratio
1.25
D / E
2.00
TIE
4.00
ROE
20.0%
ROA
6.7%
Try doubling total liabilities and halving equity — watch D/E spike and ROE rise even though net income hasn't moved. That's the leverage trap.
The leverage trap in ROE
A company can artificially inflate its ROE simply by taking on more debt. If a company borrows heavily and uses the proceeds to buy back shares, equity (the denominator) shrinks and ROE rises — even though net income hasn't improved. The company is now riskier, but the headline return metric looks better. Always look at debt-to-equity alongside ROE. A 25% ROE with D/E of 0.5 is genuinely strong operating performance. A 25% ROE with D/E of 5.0 is leverage doing all the heavy lifting — an entirely different story.
Concept Check
A company reports net income of $9 million and shareholders' equity of $60 million. Its return on equity (ROE) is closest to:
ROE = Net income ÷ Shareholders' equity = $9M ÷ $60M = 15%. ROE measures how much profit the company generates per dollar of equity capital invested by shareholders. A 15% ROE is solid in most industries, though it warrants pairing with the debt-to-equity ratio: if leverage is heavy, ROE may be elevated mechanically without any improvement in underlying operating efficiency. The 6.7% distractor reverses the inputs ($60M ÷ $9M would give roughly 6.67 in the wrong direction, not a percentage); the 18% distractor adds the values incorrectly.
Concept Check
A company generates $50 million in revenue and posts $5 million in net income. Its net profit margin is:
Net profit margin = Net income ÷ Revenue = $5M ÷ $50M = 10%. Margins vary enormously by industry: grocers operate on 1-3% margins because of high inventory turnover and low pricing power; mature software companies often post 20-30% margins because incremental sales carry near-zero marginal cost. A 10% margin is moderate, typical of mid-range industries. Net margin is most useful when compared to peers in the same industry — high margins relative to peers suggest pricing power or superior cost discipline.
Concept Check
Two companies in the same industry both report a 15% return on equity. Company X has a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3; Company Y has a debt-to-equity ratio of 3.0. Which statement is most accurate?
ROE = ROA × (Total assets ÷ Equity), where the second term is the equity multiplier driven by leverage. Identical ROE with very different leverage means very different ROA. Company X is producing the same shareholder return without relying on borrowed money — its underlying operating profitability per dollar of total assets must be substantially higher. Company Y is generating the same ROE largely through financial leverage, which mechanically amplifies returns but also amplifies risk. ROA strips out the leverage effect and reveals true operating efficiency.
Concept Check
Acme Corp's ROE has risen from 12% to 22% over two years while its debt-to-equity ratio has risen from 0.8 to 2.5. The MOST likely explanation is:
When ROE rises sharply alongside a sharp rise in D/E, the most common explanation is that leverage is doing the work, not improved operations. As equity (the denominator of ROE) shrinks relative to debt — whether through share buybacks funded by debt or through retained earnings being deployed into asset growth funded by borrowing — ROE rises mathematically even if net income hasn't grown at all. The check is to look at ROA: if ROA is flat or falling while ROE is rising, leverage is the driver. The Series 66 routinely tests this pattern as the 'leverage trap.'
Section 5 of 5~7 min · 3 concept checks
Valuation ratios & analysis in practice
Valuation ratios — what the market thinks
Valuation ratios compare a company's stock price to its underlying fundamentals. They tell you what the market is willing to pay for a dollar of earnings, a dollar of book value, or a dollar of dividends. Three to know:
P/E ratio = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share
P/E measures the price the market is paying per dollar of annual earnings. A P/E of 20 means investors are paying $20 today for each $1 of current earnings — effectively a 20-year payback period if earnings stay flat. Higher P/Es typically reflect higher growth expectations. Be careful comparing across industries: tech P/Es of 30+ are normal; utility P/Es of 15 are normal; these aren't apples-to-apples.
P/B ratio = Price per share ÷ Book value per share
P/B compares market price to accounting net worth (assets minus liabilities, per share). A P/B above 1.0 means the market values the company above its book value — usually because intangibles, brand, and future earnings aren't reflected on the balance sheet. P/B is more useful for asset-heavy businesses (banks, REITs) than for intangible-heavy ones (software, brands).
Dividend yield = Annual dividend per share ÷ Price per share
Dividend yield expresses the dividend as a percentage of the stock price — effectively the cash income return. A stock trading at $40 paying $1.60 annual dividends has a 4% yield. The next chapter (Valuation Factors) develops these ratios further; this is the orientation pass.
How analysts actually use ratios
A single ratio in isolation is close to useless. Analysts combine three lenses:
Trend analysis — how has this company's ratio changed over the last 3-5 years? A current ratio drifting from 2.5 to 1.5 to 0.9 tells a story even if the current value is still acceptable.
Peer comparison — how does this company stack up against direct competitors in the same industry? Coca-Cola's ratios vs. Pepsi's. Citigroup's vs. JPMorgan's.
Industry benchmarks — how does the company compare to the typical company in its sector? Industry medians from data providers (S&P, Bloomberg, FactSet) give a reference point.
The Series 66 frequently tests this by presenting a ratio (or a small change in one) and asking what the adviser should do next. The right answer is almost never "buy" or "sell" based on the single data point — it's some version of "investigate further, compare to peers, look at trend." A ratio is a question, not an answer.
Worked example · ABC Corp ratio analysis
ABC Corp simplified financials: Current assets $800,000 (including $300,000 inventory) · Current liabilities $400,000 · Total liabilities $1,200,000 · Shareholders' equity $600,000 · Net income $120,000 · EBIT $200,000 · Interest expense $50,000.
1
Liquidity — current and quick ratios
Current ratio = $800K ÷ $400K = 2.0
Quick ratio = ($800K − $300K) ÷ $400K = 1.25
Both above 1.0 — healthy short-term liquidity. Working capital is $400K, a solid cushion.
2
Leverage — debt-to-equity
D/E = $1,200K ÷ $600K = 2.0
$2 of debt per $1 of equity — on the higher side for most non-utility companies.
3
Coverage — times-interest-earned
TIE = $200K ÷ $50K = 4.0
Operating earnings cover annual interest 4× over — comfortable despite the elevated D/E.
The 20% ROE looks impressive, but ROA of just 6.7% reveals that leverage is doing much of the work.
Verdict
ABC Corp has solid liquidity and good interest coverage, but leverage is elevated and the headline 20% ROE is materially amplified by that leverage (ROA tells the truer operating story). Whether this is acceptable depends entirely on what industry ABC operates in — routine for a utility, concerning for a software company.
Concept Check
A stock trades at $40 and the company has trailing twelve-month earnings per share of $2. The stock's P/E ratio is:
P/E = Price per share ÷ Earnings per share = $40 ÷ $2 = 20. The market is paying $20 today for each $1 of the company's current annual earnings. A P/E of 20 is roughly average for the broad U.S. equity market historically — meaningful comparison requires looking at industry peers and the company's own historical P/E. Higher P/Es typically reflect higher growth expectations. The 5 distractor reverses the calculation ($2 ÷ $40 = 0.05, the earnings yield); 25 and 38 don't follow from any standard P/E manipulation of these inputs.
Concept Check
A company's stock trades at $30 per share with a book value per share of $10. Its price-to-book (P/B) ratio is:
P/B = Price per share ÷ Book value per share = $30 ÷ $10 = 3.0. A P/B of 3.0 means the market values the company at three times its accounting net worth (assets minus liabilities, per share). P/B above 1.0 is the norm for most companies because intangibles like brand, goodwill, and future earning power aren't fully captured on the balance sheet. P/B is most useful for asset-heavy businesses (banks, REITs, insurers) where book value approximates intrinsic value; less useful for intangible-heavy businesses like software firms.
Concept Check
An adviser is reviewing a company that reports a current ratio of 1.5. Which approach is most consistent with proper financial-ratio interpretation on the Series 66?
Proper ratio interpretation combines three lenses: trend analysis (the company's own ratio over time), peer comparison (direct competitors in the same industry), and industry benchmarks. A current ratio of 1.5 is meaningless in isolation — it could be improving (from 0.9 last year) or deteriorating (from 2.5 last year), and could be normal or unusual for the industry. The Series 66 frequently tests this contextual mindset by presenting a single ratio and asking what the adviser should do next; the right answer is almost always 'investigate further with peer and trend comparison,' not a definitive buy/sell call.
SummaryCram aid & consolidated traps
Chapter summary
Exam essentials · every formula on one screen
Current ratio
CA ÷ CL
Quick ratio
(CA − Inv) ÷ CL
Working capital
CA − CL
Debt-to-equity
Total liab ÷ Equity
Times-interest-earned
EBIT ÷ Interest exp
Net profit margin
Net income ÷ Revenue
ROA
Net income ÷ Total assets
ROE
Net income ÷ Equity
EPS
Net income ÷ Shares out
P/E ratio
Price ÷ EPS
P/B ratio
Price ÷ Book value/sh
Dividend yield
Annual div ÷ Price
Common traps to expect on the exam
"Higher ROE always means better operating performance." No — leverage mechanically inflates ROE. Pair it with D/E (or compare ROA across firms) to see whether the high ROE is real efficiency or just borrowed money.
"A current ratio above 1.0 is always healthy." Usually yes, but very high current ratios (5.0+) may indicate inefficient use of cash or stockpiled inventory. Context matters.
"A debt-to-equity of 2.0 is dangerous." For a software firm, yes. For a utility or REIT, perfectly normal. The Series 66 frequently sets industry traps where the same ratio leads to different interpretations.
"The quick ratio is more accurate than the current ratio." Different, not better. Quick is stricter (excludes inventory); current includes everything. Both are useful, in different situations.
"EPS growth = the company is doing better." EPS can grow through share buybacks alone, with no improvement in net income. The denominator shrinks; the numerator doesn't have to grow.
"A high P/E means overvalued." Not necessarily — high P/Es often reflect high growth expectations. P/E only becomes a valuation signal in context (vs. peers, vs. history, vs. growth rate).